Texans angry about their electric rates may soon have more trouble keeping track of utility legislation in Austin.
House Speaker Joe Strauss wants to scrap the House Committee on Regulated Industries and disperse the different utility issues among as many as five other committees.
Of course, there's plenty of speculation about where that leaves Rep. Phil King, who previously chaired that committee and may be punished for backing Tom Craddick in the battle for House Speaker.
But for now, reaction is focused on how the change in committees will affect those that try to shape how those utility bills look when they land on the House floor.
Kristen Doyle, who works with the Cities Aggregation Power Project which represents dozens of Texas cities in utility matters, said dispersing utility bills to different committees will put advocacy groups with fewer resources at a disadvantage.
“I think it helps those big electric utility lobbyists that can afford to have multiple lobbyists at every committee hearings,” Doyle said.
Representatives for energy companies said they would work within whatever structure the House voted on.
“Generally, we’re supportive of any committee structure that state lawmakers think will be best for the citizens of Texas,” said Lisa Singleton of Dallas-based Energy Future Holdings, formerly TXU Corp.
Rather than scrapping the Regulated Industries committee, a better solution would be to replace some of the current committee members, said Rosie Barrera with AARP Texas.
She noted that in past sessions, some members have been from areas that still regulate their electric rates, meaning their constituents weren't affected by how they voted on a lot of electricity legislation. (Current committee chairman Phil King’s district is based in Weatherford, which continues to regulate its electric rates.)
“It’s the membership we had a problem with, not the structure,” Barrera said.
-Aman Batheja