It was not a good year for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program, certainly not from either a political or public relations standpoint. And even with much revised schedules for development, production and testing, Lockheed Martin and the Defense Department were at year's end once again struggling to meet goals and deadlines.
The year began with Secretary of Defense Robert Gates having discovered just how badly the development and testing effort were off target and how far over budget the program was. In February, Gates sent the proposed defense budget to Congress with added funds for testing, a revised schedule and vastly revised -- much increased -- cost estimates.
Gates, who made it very clear in public comments he was not happy to have been so badly misled about progress just months earlier, relieved Marine Brig. Gen. David Heinz as the top manager overseeing the program and replaced him with Navy Vice Admiral David Venlet, a flier and head of naval aviation programs. Venlet was ordered to conduct a "deep dive" review of the program and report back to Gates, a progress that has been unfolding in the Pentagon in recent weeks.
Lockheed's management of the program also came under heavy criticism at times and, after the firing of Heinz, there were not so subtle hints out of the Pentagon, military and Congress that Lockheed should do likewise. Lockheed CEO Robert Stevens stoutly defended his Fort Worth F-35 chief, Dan Crowley. But shortly after the public vote of confidence Crowley was given a new assignment and later left Lockheed for a job with Raytheon in McKinney.
Pentagon cost estimates for the average price of an F-35 have soared, from about $62 million in 2001 to more than $130 million each over the life of the program. Lockheed officials insist those figures are unrealistic.
At year's end Gates was preparing a 2012 budget proposal that would pump more money into development and testing and allow more time for completion of testing on the three aircraft models, particularly the Marines F-35B.
As test planes rolled off the assembly line and began flying, the record was mixed. At year's end testing of the five F-35B aircraft at the Navy's Patuxent River, Md. test station were still behind schedule. Short takeoff and vertical landing testing has been slowed by continuing reliability problems with aircraft components. Lockheed acknowledged last month that a ground test version of the F-35B had developed cracks in a bulkhead, a major structural component. The problem occurred after just 1,500 hours of testing in a part that was supposed to last more than 8,000 hours of flight time.
On the other hand, two F-35A aircraft have flown far more flights and test points than had been expected since arriving at Edwards Air Force Base in California. A third F-35A was sent to Edwards in early December. One F-35C model, the carrier-based variant, has also flown regularly since being dispatched to Pax River.
The challenge for Lockheed and the DoD in 2012 is to get the other four flight test aircraft in the air and start meeting flight testing objectives. Pentagon officials now concede it likely won't be until 2015 or even 2016 before any F-35s are ready for service with active-duty military squadrons.
- Bob Cox